Summary: The case pertains to a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. The defendant available the plaintiff an oath, which the plaintiff accepted, as authorized under Article 163 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984. However, the defendant challenged the choice, leading to the acceptance from the appeals and remanding with the suits for https://successionmatterlawyerink66581.blogsvila.com/32330227/the-fact-about-specific-performance-lawyer-in-karachi-that-no-one-is-suggesting